Apr92025LiquidationNCLAT: Liquidation Order u/s 33 of IBC Cannot be Set Aside Once Successful Auction Purchaser Taken Possession of Property of Corporate Debtor: Taxscan Read the original article here Category: LiquidationBy EditorApril 9, 2025Post navigationPreviousPrevious post:Hire Charges Cannot Be Calculated In CIRP Costs When Asset Is Not Used by Corporate Debtor: NCLAT New DelhiNextNext post:Austria on Course for New Record Year of Corporate BankruptciesRelated PostsFraud Or Malicious Intent U/S 65 Of IBC Is Proven If Terms Of Loan Extended By Financial Creditor Are Designed To Cause Default: NCLTApril 19, 2025Liberal candidate in western Sydney seat of Greenway dumped directorship of company weeks before ATO found it owed millions in GSTApril 19, 2025Key service provider files Chapter 7 bankruptcy, plans liquidation – MSNApril 19, 2025NCLAT dismisses Byju’s Settlement Plea, Upholds InsolvencyApril 19, 2025Key service provider files Chapter 7 bankruptcy, plans liquidation – MSNApril 19, 2025Estate sale company expands into Waukesha County | Waukesha Co. Business NewsApril 19, 2025
Fraud Or Malicious Intent U/S 65 Of IBC Is Proven If Terms Of Loan Extended By Financial Creditor Are Designed To Cause Default: NCLTApril 19, 2025
Liberal candidate in western Sydney seat of Greenway dumped directorship of company weeks before ATO found it owed millions in GSTApril 19, 2025
