Daniel accepted pumping money into the two entities through companies he controls and proposed continuing to source funding to cover the companies’ operating expenses.
Daniel disputed the family’s misappropriation allegations and argued Henriette had engineered the deadlock, meaning she did not have “clean hands” in seeking liquidation.
However, Justice Grant Powell rejected Daniel’s “clean hands” argument, including his claim that the breakdown was “demonstrably caused by Henriette”.
“Neither trusts the other,” he said, as he ruled in favour of Henriette’s application to liquidate the debt-laden companies.
“Simply put, they do not mince words. The scale of the allegations is itself telling: Henriette and the rest…